Jump to content

Photo
- - - - -

NERD MATH!!!

math

  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 EvilMathGod

EvilMathGod

    Byte

  • Members
  • 14 posts

Posted 29 November 2013 - 02:46 AM

does 0.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999etc..= 1



#2 Silver_rose

Silver_rose

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 936 posts
  • LocationLoading...

Posted 29 November 2013 - 03:52 AM

Yes


Because I can...


#3 Affray

Affray

    Knower of things

  • Members
  • 5,753 posts
  • LocationThe Great White North

Posted 29 November 2013 - 08:56 AM

Well there is that.


It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.


#4 lord of the lols

lord of the lols

    Byte

  • Members
  • 60 posts

Posted 29 November 2013 - 09:59 AM

Yes. Proof: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=TINfzxSnnIE


Because if you don't do it, who's going to?


#5 Benihime

Benihime

    Megabyte

  • Members
  • 683 posts
  • LocationDee. Eff. Dub.

Posted 30 November 2013 - 10:25 AM

Almost?
image-54.jpg

#6 Bowsette

Bowsette

    Tentacular!

  • Members
  • 4,064 posts

Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:02 AM

Surely a "math god" wouldn't need to ask this question.

 

I CALL SHENANIGANS


LL1Yc5i.gif

“Shimatta! Bare… nan no koto kashira?”


#7 DeadChannel

DeadChannel

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 1,088 posts
  • LocationNotlob

Posted 30 November 2013 - 10:21 PM

no, there is actually a thing in mathematics called repeating. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...

Essentially, the amount that each 9 adds to the number is exponentially smaller.

Similar to how you can half a number an infinite number of times.

Also similar to how pi != 4


I'm fearful, I'm fearful, I'm fearful of flying, and flying is fearful of me.

#8 lord of the lols

lord of the lols

    Byte

  • Members
  • 60 posts

Posted 01 December 2013 - 03:01 PM

Pi does not equal four either. More proof: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=D2xYjiL8yyE  And if you meant Pi factorial equals four, just no.


Because if you don't do it, who's going to?


#9 DeadChannel

DeadChannel

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 1,088 posts
  • LocationNotlob

Posted 01 December 2013 - 03:50 PM

ummmmm, sorry if I lost you. I tend to use programmers notation for stuff.

 

In computer science, != means does not equal.

 

I put pi != 4

meaning pi does not equal four.


I'm fearful, I'm fearful, I'm fearful of flying, and flying is fearful of me.

#10 lord of the lols

lord of the lols

    Byte

  • Members
  • 60 posts

Posted 01 December 2013 - 11:28 PM

Ah I thought you put the exclamation point meaning either factorial or just put it in the wrong place. I apologize.


Because if you don't do it, who's going to?


#11 DeadChannel

DeadChannel

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 1,088 posts
  • LocationNotlob

Posted 02 December 2013 - 09:51 AM

Naw, its fine. I need to remember to only use things like that on programming communities.


I'm fearful, I'm fearful, I'm fearful of flying, and flying is fearful of me.

#12 lord of the lols

lord of the lols

    Byte

  • Members
  • 60 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 09:00 PM

Ya, I've tried learning how to program before, but I could never really get the hang of it.


Because if you don't do it, who's going to?


#13 Champion of Cyrodiil

Champion of Cyrodiil

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 776 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 17 December 2013 - 02:10 PM

This makes me think of derivatives in calculus.

 

Like how a plotted function can *almost* touch a tangent line when it is exclusive, but not quite... but it pretty much does, or else your brain will explode.  

 

220px-Tangent_to_a_curve.svg.png

 

I think the solid red dot means 'inclusive' so it actually does touch the line in that figure.

 

something like this may be more appropriate,
the domain:  { -infinite < x < 1 } where x is like your .9 repeating.
 



#14 seakingtheonixpected

seakingtheonixpected

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 986 posts
  • LocationSomewhere beyond the sea

Posted 17 December 2013 - 02:21 PM

                                   _

yes because 1/9 and .9/9 equal the exact same thing.



#15 Champion of Cyrodiil

Champion of Cyrodiil

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 776 posts
  • LocationVirginia

Posted 17 December 2013 - 02:50 PM

                                   _

yes because 1/9 and .9/9 equal the exact same thing.

 

 

http://polymathemati..._sorry_it_.html

 

Apparently all of this boils down to the Axiom of Choice...

 

I have always generalized that if using "Real" numbers like in Algebra, it is okay to assume .999... = 1.

 

However, when you consider limits, like in calc... I believe you have to treat them different.



#16 Mister Sympa

Mister Sympa

    Ascended Prophet

  • Moderators
  • 4,444 posts
  • LocationUSA, Earth, Milky Way

Posted 23 December 2013 - 05:29 PM

 Cyrodiil just summed up my thoughts. Practicality versus absolutely theory.

tumblr_ojjqahjSmc1rtecnto2_400.gif


#17 Rejected

Rejected

    Megabyte

  • Banned
  • 453 posts
  • Locationhttp://www.crackhackforum.com/user-54122.html

Posted 12 January 2014 - 03:52 PM

Yes. Proof: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=TINfzxSnnIE

lol when I read the first message I thought of that too


tumblr_my2mijmVhL1rb06tgo1_500.gif


#18 DeadChannel

DeadChannel

    Gigabyte

  • Members
  • 1,088 posts
  • LocationNotlob

Posted 12 January 2014 - 07:32 PM

Yeah, I suppose it would be a question of theory vs practicality, but I would still say no.


I'm fearful, I'm fearful, I'm fearful of flying, and flying is fearful of me.