I'm honestly not the best person to ask since in Christian standards I'm a very new Christian. But my guess (dont take my word for this or anything) is that they say the victim should marry the rapist because in the Bible marriage is a gift from God, and part of marriage is after your married your allowed to have sex/intercourse however you wanna say it. So I'm guessing it says they have to get married now is because the rapist took the woman/girls virginity which is part of marriage (a gift from God).
Maybe that doesn't make sense at all, but I didn't even know about that scripture until you told me so thats my spur of the moment guess on it. Hope it helped shin a new light on it.
It still appears to justify rape, though. Which is something I cannot forgive. And that's not the only part of the Bible that is horrendous by today's standards, which leads me to draw two conclusions, both equally plausible.
1. Christianity (as seen in the Bible) is false, meaning that people who abide by religion's laws and use them to justify their hatred of people who don't fit in with their clique are just using it as a cover.
-or-
2. Christianity (as seen in the Bible) is true, and all of the so-called believers of today are in fact liars who twist the original implications of the religious text to fit their own lives. Assuming they've even read it. (I've read the Bible cover to cover; I used to be quite devout until my early teens).
I just read that scripture that you put in here since I had time. And right in the scripture it said that the rapist had to marry the woman because he violated her.
Correct. Is that acceptable? If you were raped, would you wish to marry the person who put you through a violent, painful ordeal filled with terror and disgust? It states, he must marry her; she does not have a say in the matter. This is reprehensible. Inhumane, even. Granted, women were not afforded rights in the time which the Bible is set in/written, but that merely lends aid to my earlier point (point 2, because if we worked based on the belief it is all true, then as a woman I should have no rights or say in my own life)
A large part of the scriptures I just flat out don't understand. The binding of Isaac, for example (Genesis 22) is nonsensical. Why exactly did God want to test Abraham's faith by having him kill his own child? Of course, in the end God stopped it, claiming that Abraham's willingness to kill his child showed that he feared God. I don't understand quite to what end this was.
But one thing that really throws me off the Christianity train is Sumer. The Sumerian Creation Myths predate Christian teachings, yet share some very similar tales. I'm of the opinion that they are more believable, having been created long before the more modern religions.
/rambling