007: Skyfall
#1
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:23 PM
#2
Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:38 PM
It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.
#3
Posted 22 November 2012 - 01:47 AM
THE HELL YOU READING FOOL???
#5
Posted 22 November 2012 - 07:25 AM
Have you seen it yet?It is certainly on my list of things.
I enjoyed Quantum of Solace, but yes, it's better.Is it better then Quantum of solace??? After seeing that shit I refused to watch anything from Daniel Craig ever again!!!!
He made a pretty good bad guy.Javier Bardem needs to be in way more movies.
#6
Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:41 AM
Have you seen it yet?
Sadly I have not.
I have been too busy with work and working out.
By the time I even want to go to the movies I'm dead from my day.
I will go see it eventually though.
It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.
#7
Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:13 AM
#8
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:04 AM
“Shimatta! Bare… nan no koto kashira?”
#9
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:05 AM
Well boourns. Personally, I think he's the best bond.I would, but I haven't enjoyed anything Daniel Craig is in >.>
#10
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:11 AM
“Shimatta! Bare… nan no koto kashira?”
#11
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:17 AM
Do it today, no one works on thanksgiving. >.>
Canadian Thanksgiving is in October, and I run a small business so I work always.
I would, but I haven't enjoyed anything Daniel Craig is in >.>
You didn't like Layer Cake or A Kid In King Arthur's Court?
That is just because Michael Keaton never got a chance to be Bond.Well boourns. Personally, I think he's the best bond.
He was the best Batman, so by default he would be the best at everything below Batman too, which includes 007.
It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.
#12
Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:49 AM
Goldeneye was an awesome game. >.>Butbutbut Tomorrow Never Dies. Or Goldeneye. Made a shitty game, but an awesome movie.
The movies were ok, but honestly I didn't think the other bonds were as cold as they should have been.
Well damn.Canadian Thanksgiving is in October, and I run a small business so I work always.
You didn't like Layer Cake or A Kid In King Arthur's Court?
That is just because Michael Keaton never got a chance to be Bond.
He was the best Batman, so by default he would be the best at everything below Batman too, which includes 007.
#13
Posted 26 November 2012 - 12:31 AM
#14
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:58 AM
I don't think I've ever heard that complain before.
#15
Posted 26 November 2012 - 04:49 PM
Perhaps my expectations for Bond are a bit high...
#16
Posted 26 November 2012 - 06:47 PM
#17
Posted 26 November 2012 - 11:15 PM
personally, I'm enjoying the more ruthless, toned down killer that the new one is.
Perhaps that is because he is becoming less and less of a suave British secret agent and more like a skull cracking murder machine with every 007 reboot?
It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.
#18
Posted 27 November 2012 - 06:03 AM
Exactly, and that's what he's meant to be I think.Perhaps that is because he is becoming less and less of a suave British secret agent and more like a skull cracking murder machine with every 007 reboot?
I mean, look at how many people the new bond doesn't save because he just doesn't give a damn.
#19
Posted 27 November 2012 - 01:41 PM
Which might explain his new sacrifice a few for the good of the many mentality.
It is perfectly acceptable to fear and admire a being you could not possibly understand.
#20
Posted 27 November 2012 - 04:14 PM